SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3290

LISA GILL, RITU TAGORE
Nirmal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harmanjit Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. N.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for Mr.I.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate; For the Appellant
Mr. J.S. Brar, Advocate; For the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Lisa Gill, J.

This appeal has been filed by the appellant - husband challenging judgment and decree dated 03.10.2016 passed by the learned District Judge, Bathinda whereby appellant's petition under section 13 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 (for short - 'the Act' )and suit for permanent injunction had been dismissed.

2. During pendency of this appeal, matter has been amicably resolved between the parties. Their statements regarding agreement were recorded on 08.12.2022. It was agreed between the parties that a sum of Rs.15 lakhs would be handed over to the respondent - wife by the appellant and sum of Rs.5 lakhs in the form of FDR would be given to the minor daughter born out of the wedlock of the parties. Appellant further undertook to purchase 4 kanal 10 marlas of land in favour of minor daughter - Deepinder Kaur at village Singhewala, District Sri Mukhtsar Sahib. Both the parties undertook to withdraw all the cases filed by them against each other and also undertook not to file any further case against each other. However, dispute again arose between the parties with the terms and conditions of the settlement not being adhered to. Matter was again referred before the M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top