Anamika Anand vs Rohit Kapoor - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 3285

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3285

LISA GILL, RITU TAGORE
Anamika Anand – Appellant
Versus
Rohit Kapoor – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Appellant in person with Mr. Ankit Chowdhri, Advocate.
Respondent in person with Ms. Gurnam Kaur Turka, Advocate.

Table of Content
1. challenge to rejection of marital claim. (Para 1 , 2)
2. settlement agreement and waiver of statutory period. (Para 3 , 4)
3. recognition of genuine settlement and lack of coercion. (Para 5 , 6)
4. lack of possibility for marital resumption. (Para 7)
5. dissolution of marriage by mutual consent. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

Lisa Gill, J. (Oral)

This appeal has been filed by the appellant-wife challenging judgment dated 07.05.2021 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh whereby petition under section 12 of HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 filed by the appellant-wife was rejected wherein respondent-husband was proceeded ex parte.

2. During pendency of this appeal, the matter has been amicably resolved between the parties and they have decided to part ways. Terms and conditions of the settlement were set in writing on 13.01.2023. As per the settlement agreement, the appellant wife does not claim any maintenance, permanent alimony or any other financial benefit from the respondent-husband and that parties would be bound to withdraw any proceedings initiated by them against each other. It is agreed that no claim of any nature shall be raised by any of the parties qua

Click Here to Read the rest of this document