SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 970

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Sushil Kumar @ Suraj – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Manpreet Kanda, Advocate and Ms. Pridhi Sandhu, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Navdeep Singh, DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J. (Oral)

The petitioner is seeking the concession of bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.58 dated 18.03.2024 under Sections 18, 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, 'the NDPS Act') registered at Police Station Division No.8, Police Commissionerate Jalandhar.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no recovery of any contraband was effected from the petitioner in the FIR in question and his name has surfaced in a disclosure statement allegedly suffered by co-accused Gagandeep Singh, who has been already extended the concession of bail by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 24.04.2024 (Anneuxre P-3). It has been asserted by the learned counsel that even when the petitioner was arrested pursuant to the aforesaid alleged disclosure statement on 21.03.2024, no recovery of any contraband much less opium was effected from him which lends credence to his false implication in the present case. Learned counsel has argued that the evidentiary value of the disclosure statement on the basis of which he has been challenged does not carry much weight. Learned counsel has, thus, argued that in the af

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top