MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Mukesh Narang – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Mrs. Manjari Nehru Kaul, J.
The instant petitions have been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., for quashing of complaint bearing No.COMP/28520/2020 under Sections 384 , 193, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 506 IPC filed by respondent No.2 before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate, Gurugram (Annexure P-7) as well as order dated 11.09.2020 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurugram (Annexure P-8) with a further prayer for quashing of FIR No.256 dated 22.09.2020 under Sections 384 , 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120-B IPC registered at Police Station New Colony, Gurugram (Annexure P-9). Since both the petitions arise from the same order, they are being disposed of by this common order.
2. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners contends that the complainant respondent No.2 had borrowed a sum of Rs. 18,46,100/- in the year 2016 from the petitioner-Narender Yadav's Company namely M/s Royal Chit Fund Private Limited, Gurugram, however, he defaulted in making timely payment of the installments. After repeated requests made by the petitioner-Narender Yadav to respondent No.2 to discharge his legal liability, respondent No.2 ultimately issued cheque No.411480 dated 16.03
Anju Chaudhary v. State of UP (SC)
Father Thomas v. State of U.P.
Lalita Kumari v. Govt. Of U.P.
Maksud Saiyed v. State of Gujarat
Mona Panwar v. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mrs. Priyanka Srivastava v. State of U.P.
A magistrate must apply mind and provide reasoning when taking cognizance of complaints; failure to do so allows for quashing of proceedings to prevent abuse of process.
(1) If once court of competent jurisdiction did not take cognizance of offences when a complaint was made and said order became final, another complaint on same allegations though filed by complainan....
Direction for Police investigation – Order of Magistrate should reflect that he has applied his mind to facts of case and law applicable to and it has to examine nature of allegations made in complai....
The Magistrate has discretion to treat a complaint as a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. instead of mandatorily forwarding it for FIR registration under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
Allegations of fraud must demonstrate clear fraudulent intent at the time of the agreement, solely distinguishing civil disputes from criminal cases under IPC Sections 405 and 420.
The court found that the complaint filed by Respondent No. 2 was malafide and deficient, lacking an affidavit supporting the contents, and lacking necessary details. The court also found that the com....
A complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. must demonstrate a prima facie case of cheating, including proof of dishonest intention, which was not established in this case.
Point of law : Whenever a Magistrate decides to refer a complaint to investigation by police under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., he does not take cognizance, he awaits the filing of charge sheet and takes ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.