SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3023

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Rex GIobal Limited – Appellant
Versus
Supreme Rubbers India Ludhiana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sahir Singh Virk, Advocate; For the Petitioner(s).

Table of Content
1. claim petition challenges and contract details. (Para 2 , 3)
2. pending objections in facilitation council. (Para 4 , 7 , 8)
3. limitation and registration issues under msmed act. (Para 5 , 6)
4. supreme court ruling on claims prior to registration. (Para 9)
5. dismissal of petitions as premature. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J.

Both the above said writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order as the controversy involved in them is identical.

2. The brief facts in CWP-9991-2023 relate to raising a challenge to the proceedings instituted before the respondent No.2- District Level Micro and Small Facilitation Council, Ludhiana, on a claim petition/reference No.946 of 2020. It has been averred by the petitioner that it has been falsely embroiled in the claim petition by respondent No.1- M/s Supreme Rubbers India, Ludhiana.

3. The above claim application has been submitted under Section 18 of the Medium, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter to be referred as the MSMED Act, 2006') based on a contract dated 10.02.2014 for recovery of principal amount of Rs.13,89,500/- and interest of Rs.15,47,907/- thereupon. It is averre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top