SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2890

VIKAS SURI
Madhu Saini – Appellant
Versus
Raj Rani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate; For the Petitioners

Table of Content
1. background of civil revision petition and prior proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court analysis on granting cross-examination opportunity. (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. arguments on the necessity of cross-examination. (Para 5 , 6)
4. established rights regarding cross-examination. (Para 11)
5. final order allowing cross-examination with conditions. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Vikas Suri, J.

This is a civil revision petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved against the order dated 12.01.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Rent Controller, Ambala whereby the opportunity for cross-examination of PW1-Rajni Bala (landlord) was ordered to be considered as 'Nil'.

2. A perusal of the paper book shows that the respondents filed a petition seeking ejectment of the petitioners from the demised premises. In the ejectment petition, an application under Section 6 -A of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 was also filed claiming therein that the tenant was in arrears since 01.03.2018. During the restricted functioning of the Courts between the period from 01.04.2020 up to 10.05.2021, the matter kept being adjourned in view of num

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top