Back
VIKAS BAHL
Karan Abrol – Appellant
Versus
Baba Farid University of Health Sciences – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the petitioner's case and examination results. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding revaluation and alleged bias. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's finding on the prohibition of revaluation. (Para 7) |
| 4. final decision dismissing the writ petition. (Para 8) |
| 5. dismissal of miscellaneous applications. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT
Mr. Vikas Bahl, J.
(Oral) The present Civil Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent Nos.1 and 2 to revaluate the theory papers of Masters of Dental Surgery (Prosthodontics) held in the month of May/June 2020 and for revising the result of the petitioner.
2. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had passed his Bachelor in Dental Surgery (BDS) in the year 2009 from Baba Farid University of Health Sciences by obtaining 60% marks and was thereafter, appointed as Medical Officer (Dental) on 09.06.2011 and had then applied for MDS (Prosthodontics & Crown & Bridge) in the respondent University in the year 2016 and was, on the basis of merit, admitted in MDS (Prosthodontics And Crown & Bridge) in the Session
Re-evaluation of answer scripts – In absence of any provision for re-evaluation in relevant rules, examinees have no right to claim or demand re-evaluation – Sympathy or compassion does not play any ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
