IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA, JJ.
Rishipal - Appellant
Versus
Kulwinder Singh - Respondent
CRM-M No. 14140 of 2023
Decided On : 24-09-2024
JUDGMENT :
Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J.:- The “to be answered reference”, as enclosed in the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, upon CRM-M-14140-2023, becomes ad verbatim extracted hereinafter:
2. The facts relevant for the rendition of an answer to the above extracted reference, are that, in terms of the provisions embodied in Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘N.I. Act’), provisions whereof become extracted hereinafter, the learned Magistrate concerned drew an order on 02.11.2022, upon CIS No. NACT/267/2021, thus directing the accused to pay 20% of the cheque amount as interim compensation to the complainant.
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Court trying an offence under section 138 may order the drawer of the cheque to pay interim compensation to the complainant—
(a) in a summary trial or a summons case, where he pleads not guilty to the accusation made in the complaint; and
(b) in any other case, upon framing of charge.
(2) The interim compensation under sub-section (1) shall not exceed twenty per cent of the amount of the cheque.
(3) The interim compensation shall be paid within sixty days from the date of the order under subsection (1), or within such further period not exceeding thirty days as may be directed by the Court on sufficient cause being shown by the drawer of the cheque.
(4) If the drawer of the cheque is acquitted, the Court shall direct the complainant to repay to the drawer the amount of interim compensation, with interest at the bank rate as published by the Reserve Bank of India, prevalent at the beginning of the relevant financial year, within sixty days from the date of the order, or within such further period not exceeding thirty days as may be directed by the Court on sufficient cause being shown by the complainant.
(5) The interim compensation payable under this section may be recovered as if it were a fine under section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974).
(6) The amount of fine imposed under section 138 or the amount of compensation awarded under section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), shall be reduced by the amount paid or recovered as interim compensation under this section.”
3. The order (supra) becomes challenged by the aggrieved therefrom accused, through his instituting the CRM-M-14140-2023, which is yet subjudice before this Court. It appears that no final adjudication has been made upon the said petition, as an answer to the reference (supra) is awaited. The order (supra) becomes extracted hereinafter:
Now to come upon 09.01.2023 for payment of interim compensation as well as evidence of complainant.”
4. It would be apt to record here that, the petition (supra) is tagged with CRM-M-16597-2023, on account of its encompassing an almost alike impugned order and also an alike issue. The order impugned therein also becomes extracted hereinafter:
Rakesh Ranjan Shrivastava V/s State of Jharkhand and another”
Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act is directory, allowing judicial discretion in awarding interim compensation, requiring consideration of case merits and relevant factors.
(1) Provision of sub-section (1) of Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which provides for grant of interim compensation, is directory and not mandatory.(2) Non-payment of interim comp....
The provisions of Section 143-A of the N.I. Act are directory and not mandatory.
Interim compensation under Section 143-A of the NI Act is discretionary, requiring consideration of both parties' merits and the opportunity for a defense, which was not provided in this case.
Word ‘may’ appearing in Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is not discretionary but directory in nature.
Interim compensation under Section 143A of the NI Act can be granted before trial; the presumption of validity remains even if not all amounts are covered by the cheque.
Power under Section 143A NI Act to direct interim compensation is discretionary, requiring prima facie evaluation of case and defence, with brief reasons recorded; mechanical orders lacking applicati....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.