Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Ignoring Court-Mandated PWD Safety Report Invalidates Municipal Order: J&K&L High Court
06 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Reserves Verdict in Raju Tampering Conviction Plea
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
ANOOP CHITKARA
Neeraj Saluja – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
Anoop Chitkara, J.
PREDICATE OFFENCES [FOR THE CURRENT ECIR]:
| S. No. | FIR No. | Date |
The necessity of providing documented 'reasons to believe' at the time of arrest under Section 19 of PMLA is a statutory requirement that must be adhered to for the arrest to be lawful.
The court upheld the legality of the petitioner's arrest under the PMLA, emphasizing the necessity of compliance with statutory safeguards and the scope of judicial review.
The court ruled that the arrest of the petitioner was unlawful due to insufficient evidence linking him to illegal mining, which is not a scheduled offence under the Prevention of Money Laundering Ac....
The court upheld the legality of the arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, confirming compliance with statutory requirements, including timely communication of grounds for arrest.
The court held that the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 as there were no reasonable grounds for believing that she had committed an off....
Compliance with Section 19 of PMLA and satisfaction of twin conditions under Section 45 of PMLA are crucial for determining the validity of arrest and granting bail.
The court established the statutory right of the enforcement agency to conduct further investigation and file subsequent complaints without seeking prior permission, as empowered by the provisions of....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for strict compliance with the mandatory provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in the arrest and bail application pr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article