SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1250

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J.
Surender Panwar – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
CRM-M No. 41194 of 2024
Decided On : 23-09-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Arshdeep Singh Cheema, Satish Sharma, R.S. Cheema, Tanu Bedi, Sanjay Suri
For the Respondents: Zoheb Hossain, Lokesh Narang

The court ruled that the arrest of the petitioner was unlawful due to insufficient evidence linking him to illegal mining, which is not a scheduled offence under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Sections 3 and 4 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Petition challenging the legality of arrest and remand orders - Petitioner arrested under ECIR for illegal mining activities - Court found no substantial evidence linking petitioner to the alleged offences, emphasizing that illegal mining is not a scheduled offence under PMLA - Arrest deemed unlawful due to lack of evidence and procedural non-compliance. (Paras 1, 6, 10, 19, 20, 21)

(B) Legal Standards for Arrest - The necessity of concrete evidence and compliance with statutory provisions for arrest under PMLA - The term 'may' in Section 19(1) indicates that arrest is not mandatory and should be based on substantial grounds. (Paras 3.4, 3.6, 4.2)

(C) Judicial Precedents - The court referenced various cases to highlight the necessity of material evidence before arrest and the importance of adhering to procedural safeguards. (Paras 17, 17.1)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was arrested on allegations of illegal mining and money laundering based on multiple FIRs. The Enforcement Directorate claimed the petitioner was part of a syndicate involved in illegal mining, but the petitioner argued he was not named in the FIRs and had ceased to be a director of the implicated company.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the arrest lacked legal foundation due to insufficient evidence linking the petitioner to the alleged crimes and procedural violations in the arrest process.

Issues: The main issues included the legality of the arrest, the sufficiency of evidence, and the interpretation of statutory provisions regarding arrest under PMLA.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the arrest was unlawful due to the absence of substantial evidence and procedural compliance, emphasizing that illegal mining is not a scheduled offence under PMLA.

Result: Petition allowed; arrest and remand orders quashed.

JUDGMENT :

Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J.

1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C”) with the following prayer:

    (i) for issuance of a direction to declare the arrest of the petitioner illegal, non-est and against the statutory provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short “PMLA”); Cr.P.C as well as the provisions of Constitution.

    (ii) to set aside the two consequential remand orders: (a) order dated 20.07.2024 (P-2) and (b) order dated 29.07.2024 (P-4) passed by learned Special Court, PMLA, Ambala on the basis of unlawful and illegal arrest of the petitioner in case ECIR/GNZO/19/2023 dated 23.09.2023 (for short “ECIR No. 19”) under Section 3 and punishable under Section 4 of PMLA.

    (iii) to issue an order or direction as this Court deems appropriate to release the petitioner forthwith and/or also on interim bail during the pendency of the petition in the exigency of forthcoming State Legislative Assembly elections in the State of Haryana.

    (vi) further issue any appropriate order, relief or direction which this Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the present case.

BRIEF FACTS:

2. In the intervening night of 19/20.07.2024 at 01.40 a.m, petitioner was arrested in the Zonal Office, Enforcement Directorate (for short “E.D”), Gurugram. For reference, the allegations of E.D, as contained in the “Grounds of Arrest” dated 20.07.2024 (R-2 colly.), are recapitulated as under:

    “1. On the basis of 8 FIRs bearing nos. 226 dated 14.10.2022, 116 dated 23.03.2023, 111 dated 01.06.2023, 206 dated 19.09.2022, 216 dated 30.09.2022, 204 dated 14.09.2022, 33 dated 10.02.2023 and 54 dated 16.02.2023 registered at police station of Yamuna Nagar District, an ECIR no. ECIR/GNZO/19/2023 dated 23.09.2023 was recorded for schedule offences u/s 120-B, 411, 419, 420, 467 & 471 of IPC, 1860.

    2. Further, an FIR No. 0021 dated 19.01.2024 u/s. 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Regulation of Development) Act 1957, u/s. 15 & 16 of Environment Protection Act, 1986 and u/s. 120-B & 420 of IPC, 1860 was recorded at P.S. Pratap Nagar, Yamuna Nagar against Dilbag Singh, Rajinder Singh, Kulwinder Singh (Proprietor- PS Buildtech), Manoj Kumar Wadhwa, Angad Singh Makkar, Gurpartap Singh Mann, Raman Ojha, Rajesh Chikara, Inderpal Singh & Others. Above accused persons are related to entities/firms namely Development Strategies India Pvt. Ltd., Delhi Royalty Company, Mubarikpur Royalty Company, JSM Foods Pvt. Ltd. & PS Buildtech, which were involved in illegal mining. This FIR was subsumed and taken on record in the proceedings of the ECIR bearing no. ECIR/GNZO/19/2023 dated 23.09.2023.

    3. Based on the information gathered from the field enquiry, it was also found that a huge number of fake e-rawana bills are being generated by these Mining groups on the portal of Mining Department showing purchase from other states and the electronic purchase has been given to various stone crushers and screening plants, through whom, on the basis of this electronic purchase, illegal mining is being done in large quantities from the surrounding areas of Yamuna Nagar, causing huge revenue loss to the state government. No mining is being done from the mining areas mentioned in the e-rawana bills generated by the groups, nor can mining be done from those areas because there is no availability of minerals there at present.

    4. Further, on the basis of discreet enquiries, investigation and material in possession, search under section 17 of PMLA, 2002 was carried out on 04.01.2024 on various identified entities & Directors/ Promoters/ Employees/ Key persons and others and concluded on 08.01.2024, which resulted in recovery of various incriminating documents, digital devices, valuables and other items.

    5. During the search proceedings, statement of various key/related persons with respect to mining wer

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top