SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1330

MANISHA BATRA
Narinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Pardhuman Garg, Ruchika Sabherwal, Shivya Sehgal

JUDGMENT :

Manisha Batra, J.

CRM-48740 of 2024

The application is allowed as prayed for and pendrive along with Certificate under Section 63 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (earlier Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act), is taken on record.

Main Case

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”) seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR mentioned below:

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

132

29.09.2024

Dakha, District Ludhiana Rural

115(2), 117 (2), 190, 191(3), 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNS”) (110 and 117 (4) of BNS added later on)

2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of statement recorded by the complainant-Dalbir Singh alleging therein that he had performed marriage with Manjit Kaur on 05.07.2024. Manjit Kaur had left her matrimonial home on 16.07.2024. On 28.09.2024, he received a message through his friend that Manjit Kaur wanted to meet him at Baba Chicken, Mullanpur. On the same day, on receipt of this information, the complainant went to meet her at the shop of Baba Chicken Mullanpur wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top