SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 22

SUVIR SEHGAL
Krishna – Appellant
Versus
Rameshwar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma Adv. , Mr. Sanjay Verma Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Suvir Sehgal, J.

1. This order shall dispose off both the above-noted appeals filed by the claimants and owner-cum-driver under Section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 (for brevity “MV Act”) as they arise out of the same award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kaithal (for short “the Tribunal”). For the sake of convenience, factual position is being taken from FAO-2800-2017, titled as Smt. Krishna and another Versus Rameshwar and others .

2. This appeal has been filed by the claimants, who are legal representatives of Rakesh Kumar, deceased, for enhancement of compensation granted by the Tribunal vide award dated 15.10.2016.

3. Facts, in brief, leading to the filing of the appeal are that on 30.09.2015, Rakesh Kumar and Sudesh Kumar, were travelling on separate motorcycles. A Mahindra Tractor bearing registration No. HR-08-D-2716, which was being carelessly driven by Rameshwar - respondent No.1, collided with the motorcycle of Rakesh Kumar, who fell on the road and sustained multiple injuries. He was taken to the G.H. Kaithal, where he was declared dead. An FIR No. 99, dated 01.10.2015, was lodged at Police Station Pundri, under Sections 279 , 304-A, I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top