Yashpal vs State of Haryana - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 122

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 122

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Yashpal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Pardeep Panwar

Table of Content
1. petition for anticipatory bail details. (Para 1)
2. arguments for and against bail. (Para 2 , 5)
3. court's examination of evidence. (Para 6 , 7)
4. final dismissal of petition. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT :

Manjari Nehru Kaul, J.

1. The petitioner is seeking the concession of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of BNS S in case FIR No. 545 dated 29.09.2024 under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 190, 191(1) of the BNS registered at Police Station Adarsh Nagar, Ballabgarh, District Faridabad.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the petitioner was neither named in the FIR nor assigned any specific role in the alleged occurrence. In fact, the petitioner was not even present at the time of the incident. It has been asserted that the petitioner’s implication in the instant case is solely based on a disclosure statement allegedly made by co-accused Vipin, who falsely claimed that the petitioner was present with him when the complainant was assaulted. It has been argued that the said disclosure statement, apart from having minimal evidentiary value, is the only material against the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document