Narender @ Narender Kumar vs State of Haryana

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(P&H) 134

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Narender @ Narender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rahul Sidher, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana

JUDGMENT :

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J.

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.482 dated 18.12.2025 registered under Sections 115, 117(2), 126, 3(5) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Section 110 of the BNS added later on), at Police Station Agroha, District Hisar.

2. Brief facts as per the case of the prosecution are that the petitioner along with co-accused attacked and caused injuries to the complainant. Hence, the present FIR.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He argued that the alleged occurrence took place on 16.12.2025 but the FIR in question was registered on 18.12.2025 i.e. after an unexplained delay of 02 days, casting serious doubt on the prosecution story. He further submitted that the petitioner was neither named in the FIR, nor has any concern with the said offence. It has also been contended that the petitioner has been nominated as an accused only on the basis of the disclosure statement made by the co- accused Satpal. Apart from the disclosure statement, there is no other e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document