SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1423

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Rati Bai – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent Engineer – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Monu Sharma and Mr. Yogesh Saini

JUDGMENT :

Jagmohan Bansal, J (Oral) -

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of Award dated 15.02.2016 (Annexure P-1) whereby Labour Court has answered the reference against her.

2. The petitioner claims that she joined respondent No. 2-office of Executive Engineer, Haryana PWD (B&R) on 01.11.1996. She worked till 30.09.2003 and was terminated on 01.10.2003. On her application, the matter was referred to Labour Court which vide Award dated 07.11.2013 dismissed her claim. She preferred CWP-12455-2014 before this Court. The said writ petition was allowed by way of remand. The Labour Court passed fresh Award on 15.02.2016 which is under challenge.

3. On the asking of Court, Mr. Monu Sharma, Advocate submitted that petitioner is an illiterate lady and due to wrong advice, COVID-19 and family circumstances, she could not approach this Court within reasonable period.

4. On the earlier occasion she approached this Court and her petition was allowed. The matter was remanded back to Labour Court. Her husband has filed CWP-14287-2016 before this Court. These facts collectively indicate that petitioner is well aware o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top