SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 160

RAJENDRA KUMAR IV
Surendra Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Dharmendra Dwivedi for petitioner;
Shiraj Qureshi, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The petition arises out of the award dated 14.2.2013 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court No.2, Gwalior, in and by which, Labour Court dismissed the claim of the claimant/petitioner/workman.

2. Brief facts which led to filing of this petition are as under :--

i- Petitioner was appointed on the post of Pump Attender in Public Health & Engineering Department on 1/1/1990 and was working on the same post since then. Without giving show-cause notice to him or affording sufficient opportunity of hearing, authority removed him from the service.

ii- Petitioner filed his claim before the Labour Court, which was contested by respondents denying the fact made by the petitioner and submitted that workman/claimant/petitioner was neither appointed on the alleged post nor he worked for the period as alleged nor he was given any salary / remuneration by the department.

iii- After considering the entire facts and legal proposition, learned Labour Court rejected the claim of the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner mainly submits that Labour Court has erred in passing the impugned award / order in dismissing the claim. Workman/petitioner was appointed as a Pump At

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top