Santosh Kumar vs Santosh Rani - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 372

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 372

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL
Santosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Rani – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Prabhjot Singh Mann, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral)

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 10.10.2024 vide which the eviction petition filed by the respondent has been allowed and the present petitioner has been directed to vacate and hand over the possession of the premises in question. Challenge is also the judgment dated 13.01.2025 passed by the Appellate Authority vide which the appeal filed by the present petitioner has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is now ready to pay the rent and has submitted that the impugned orders be set aside and the petitioner be granted one more opportunity to pay the rent due.

3. This Court has heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and has perused the paper book and finds that the impugned orders have been rightly passed and deserve to be upheld and the present petition being meritless, deserves to be dismissed for the reasons stated hereinafter.

4. It is not in dispute that the respondent had filed a petition under Section 20 of the Punjab Rent Act , 1995 for ejectment of the present petitioner from the shop in question and in the said case, the provisional rent was assessed by the R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document