SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1989

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS SURI
Shankar The Chat Shop – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Goyal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Dinesh Kumar Jangra, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vikas Suri, J.

The present revision petition has been filed impugning the order dated 18.05.2023 passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Panchkula, whereby appeal preferred against the order dated 10.04.2023 passed by the Rent Controller, Panchkula, ordering eviction of the tenants and sub-tenants and put the petitioner in vacant possession of the demised premises, has been dismissed.

2. The facts of the case are that respondent No.1-landlord filed a petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for short 'Rent Act'), for eviction of tenant and sub-tenants on the grounds of non-payment of rent, sub-letting and personal necessity from the demised premises, i.e. commercial booth No.54, Sector-7, Panchkula. It was averred that the demised premises was let out to respondent No.2 vide rent agreement dated 30.12.2020 for a period of 11 months w.e.f. 01.01.2021 to 30.11.2021 at the rate of Rs. 1,00,000/- per month payable in advance. It was further agreed that the rent shall be enhanced at the rate of 10%, if tenancy continues beyond the expiry of the rent agreement. Petitioners opposed the said petition and submitted that they had purchased the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top