CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA, M. G. PRIYADARSINI
Aripally Laxmi – Appellant
Versus
To whom so ever it may concern – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.G. Priyadarsini, J.
Assailing the order dated 03.12.2021 in G.W.O.P. No.20 of 2021 passed by the Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nizamabad, the appellant preferred the present appeal.
2. Vide aforesaid order, the Court below dismissed the application filed by the appellant under Section 29(a) & (2) of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (for short ‘the Act, 1890’) r/w Section 8(2) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 (for short, ‘the Act, 1956’) seeking ratification of sale transaction covered by registered sale deed vide document No. 2086 of 2017 entered between the appellant and Kede Lachmanna in respect of the schedule property as absolute sale transaction on her behalf and also on behalf of her minor children i.e., Kumari Aripally Harini, Master Harshith and Kumari Hasini.
3. The appellant herein is the petitioner before the Court below. She is the mother of three minor children i.e., Kumari Aripally Harini, Master Harshith and Kumari Hasini. According to the appellant, her husband, Aripally Chinna Narasaiah, was absolute owner and possessor of petition schedule property i.e., land to an extent of Ac.0.26 guntas in Sy. No. 621/EE
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.