SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 699

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NIDHI GUPTA
Girdawar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kulwinder Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. A.S.Khinda, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Nidhi Gupta, J.

CM-7900-C-2022

Prayer in this application filed under Section 151 CPC is for condonation of delay of 58 days in refiling the accompanying appeal.

2. Heard.

3. For the reasons mentioned in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit of learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, the same is allowed and delay of 58 days in refiling the appeal is condoned.

RSA-2275-2022 (O&M)

Present Second Appeal has been filed by the defendant against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned Courts below whereby suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent for permanent injunction, has been decreed by both the Courts below.

2. It is inter alia submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the suit of the plaintiff could not have been decreed as the plaintiff had failed to establish her title. It is submitted that simple suit for permanent injunction is not maintainable because there is dispute of title of the parties of the property in question. As such, plaintiff ought to have filed suit for declaration. Moreover, the learned Courts below have relied upon inadmissible false document i.e. Mark B report made by the Police Officer. It is contended that the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top