SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 759

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL
Rupinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Tarsem Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral) - Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 13.08.2024 (Annexure P-5) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Batala vide which the application filed by the petitioner/defendant under Section 151 CPC for appointment of Local Commissioner has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondent had filed a suit for permanent injunction and there is a dispute regarding identity of the property and the Local Commissioner previously appointed by the Court had not carried out the demarcation in the presence of the petitioner and thus, a prayer has been made that another Local Commissioner be appointed. It is further submitted that the impugned order vide which the said application for appointment of second Local Commissioner has been dismissed is illegal and deserves to be set aside and the application filed by the petitioner for appointment of second Local Commissioner deserves to be allowed.

3. This Court has heard learned counsel for the petitioner and has perused the paper-book and is of the opinion that the order dated 13.08.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top