SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1823

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
SUMEET GOEL
Savitri Devi – Appellant
Versus
Sita Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Sumeet Goel, J.

1. Present criminal revision petition is filed against the order dated 20.01.2017 passed by the Learned Family Court, Hisar, in a case bearing No. MNT 357-III of 2016, whereby an application filed by the petitioner-herein (wife) under Section 127 of the Cr.P.C. was allowed. In the present petition, it is contended that the amount of maintenance as enhanced by the Family Court in favour of the petitioner, vide the impugned order, is inadequate and is entitled to be enhanced.

2. Facts germane to the adjudication of the present petition are that initially the petitioner filed a petition against the respondent for grant of maintenance on the ground of her being his legally wedded wife and not possessing sufficient means to maintain herself. The said petition was allowed by the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hisar vide order dated 06.03.1996 and an amount of Rs.500/- per month was awarded to the petitioner as maintenance. Thereafter, the petitioner is stated to have filed an application under Section 127 of the Cr.P.C., seeking enhancement of the maintenance amount so granted, whereby the mainteance amount of Rs.500/- per month, as originally gran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top