Harjit Singh Alias Gopa vs State Of Punjab

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1889

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ANOOP CHITKARA
Harjit Singh Alias Gopa – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Kanav Bansal, DAG, Punjab

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.	Dated	Police Station	Sections
135	20.07.2023	City South, Moga	21/22/29/61/85 of NDPS Act and Sections 7, 13(2) of PC Act (27-B of NDPS Act added later on)

1. The petitioner under arrest for violating the provisions as mentioned above, as per the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail by filing the present petition.

2. As per para 13 of the petition, the petitioner declares the following criminal history:-

Sr. No.	FIR No.	Dated	Police Station	Sections
1	136	20.07.2023	City South, Moga	21/29/61/85 of NDPS Act
2	87	10.05.2022	City Moga	21/29 of NDPS Act
3	65	04.04.2022	City South Moga	21/61/85 of NDPS Act
4	256	23.11.2022	21/22 of NDPS Act	- - -
5	203	08.10.2023	452/323/427/148/149 IPC	- - -
6	208	28.08.2021	21/29 of NDPS Act	City South Moga
7	52	08.04.2021	21(a)/61/85 of NDPS Act	City South Moga

3. On 04.04.2024, when the matter was heard, petitioner's counsel made the following statement:-

"Petitioner's counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions and states that they would have no objection to the conditions i.e. declaration of assets by the petitioner and his spouse, and are also voluntarily agreeable to the condition that till the c