Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Kapoor Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jag Ram – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Virinder Aggarwal, J. (Oral)
1. The appellant/defendant, being gravely aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment and decree dated 21.07.1999 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (I), Jind in Civil Appeal No. 84 of 16.07.1997, whereby the well-reasoned and judicious judgment and decree dated 11.06.1997 rendered by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Narwana in Civil Suit No. 226 dated 07.04.1994, titled "Kapoor Singh v. Hardeva and Others" was erroneously set aside, most respectfully invokes the appellate and supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918, through the present Regular Second Appeal (for short to be referred as "RSA"). The appellant humbly beseech this Court to restore the lawful and well-merited decree passed by the learned Trial Court and to redress the substantial miscarriage of justice occasioned by the impugned appellate judgment.
1.1 It is further submitted that the impugned judgment and decree are vitiated by manifest illegality, perversity, and a fundamental misdirection in law. The findings recorded therein rest upon a gross mis-appreciation of evidence and an erroneous application of settled
The court clarified that allowing additional evidence for demarcation in boundary disputes is essential and does not constitute filling up a lacuna, reinforcing the importance of accurate boundary de....
The plaintiff's appeal against the dismissal of her suit was rejected as the demarcation report showed lawful encroachment on government land.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
