Sunita vs Sanjay - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 1260

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1260

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
NIDHI GUPTA
Sunita – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Akhil Kamra, Advocate for Dr. Anand K. Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Nidhi Gupta, J.

CM-19395-C-2018

2. Prayer in this application filed under Section 151 CPC is for condonation of delay of 22 days in filing the accompanying appeal.

3. Heard.

4. For the reasons mentioned in the application which is supported by an affidavit of the applicant/petitioner, the same is allowed and delay of 22 days in filing the accompanying appeal is condoned.

RSA-14992-2018 (O&M)

5. The present appeal has been filed by plaintiff No.2 against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the Courts below, whereby the suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction filed by the appellant/plaintiff No.2, has been dismissed by both the Courts below.

6. At the very outset, it may be pointed out that the present appeal is of the year 2018. However, notice has not yet been issued in the same as since 2018, the matter has been adjourned multiple times either due to non-appearance of, or at request of ld. counsel for the appellant.

7. The parties shall hereinafter be referred to as per their status before the learned trial Court i.e. the appellant is the plaintiff No.2'; and the respondents are the defendants'.

8. It may also be pointed out that the present sui

Click Here to Read the rest of this document