SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1496

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SHEEL NAGU, SANJIV BERRY
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Sub Registrar, Sub Tehsil Nighdu Karnal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Senior Advocate with Ms. Preet Agroa, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Addl. Advocate General, Mr. Diwan Sharma, Advocate

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The petitioner-bank’s prior charge over assets is affirmed; petition allowed; sale deed registration mandated (!) (!) - Section 26E of SARFAESI Act establishes priority of secured creditors over government dues after registration of security, though not applicable to the facts since 2020 notification; court notes priority despite later amendments (!) (!) (!) - Rapat entry or administrative notes cannot defeat prior statutory rights of mortgagee; cannot be used to refuse registration (!) - The court quashes the prior rapat entry in favor of the District Food and Supply Department; permits Haryana to recover its dues after bank’s dues are satisfied (!) (!) - Costs of petition awarded Rs. 25,000, with breakdown to petitioner and Bar Association, due to delay by State of Haryana (!) - The court directs compliance within two months and contemplates listing IOIN if not complied (!) - The decision references prior judicial principles that secured creditor rights to recover debt are prior to crown/government debts (Dena Bank v. Bhikhabhai Prabhudas Parekh) (!)

What is the priority of secured creditors over government tax dues under SARFAESI Act, as interpreted in this case?

What is the effect of rapat entries on prior statutory rights of mortgagees and registration of SARFAESI sale deeds?

What is the remedy or order granted by the court regarding registration of the sale deed and quashing of intervening charges?


Table of Content
1. failure to register sale deed by sub-registrar. (Para 1)
2. petition for writ of mandamus to register sale deed. (Para 2 , 3)
3. priority dispute between bank and state over secured assets. (Para 4 , 5)
4. section 26e of the sarfaesi act pertains to priority. (Para 6)
5. rapat entry administration does not trump prior statutory mortgage. (Para 7 , 8)
6. issuance of writ of mandamus in favor of petitioning bank. (Para 9)
7. cost of petition assessed against the state of haryana. (Para 10)
8. clarification on the future application of section 26e. (Para 11)
9. disposal of pending applications. (Para 12)

JUDGMENT :

SHEEL NAGU, C.J.

1. This petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by State Bank of India (‘SBI’ for brevity) aggrieved by inaction on the part of respondent No.1/Sub-Registrar, Sub-Tehsil Nigdhu, District Karnal in failing to register the sale deed in favour of the auction purchaser-respondent No.2 (M/s Mahadev Foods), despite the said auction purchaser having been declared as a ‘successful bidder’ in the e-auction held on 21.09.2021 and depositing the entire sale consideration of Rs.738.00 lacs, and the sale certificate having been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top