SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2535

AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA I
Sapna @ Sapna Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant :Keshav Prasad Advocate.
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

Table of Content
1. application to quash prior ruling for passport issuance. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. reference to past court orders regarding passport and travel. (Para 5 , 6)
3. argument against passport denial due to pending criminal case. (Para 7 , 9 , 11)
4. statutory framework governing passport issuance and denial. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. discretion of court in allowing passport issuance despite pending cases. (Para 16 , 17 , 19)
6. outcome and directives for next steps in the application process. (Para 18 , 20)

JUDGMENT

Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.

Heard Sri Keshav Prasad, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Alok Saran, learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash the order dated 19.12.2022, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No.29, Lucknow in Case No.38118/2018, arising out of Crime No.621/2018, under Sections 406 & 420 I.P.C., Police Station Ashiyana, District Lucknow, whereby learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No.29, Lucknow has rejected the application of the present applicant for obtaining no objection certificate/permission regarding issuance of passport to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top