Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMEET GOEL
Sarafuddin Ayub Sheikh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the accused allegations in cyber fraud. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against granting bail. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. analysis of the seriousness of allegations and petitioner’s criminal history. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. decision against granting bail based on factual background. (Para 9) |
| 5. final dismissal of bail petition. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
SUMEET GOEL, J.
Present petition has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.0010 dated 07.02.2024, registered under Sections 420 , 467, 468, 471 & 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘ IPC ’), at Cyber Police Station, Rohtak.
2. The gravamen of the FIR in question is that complainant, namely, Rajpal Yadav, son of Banwari Lal, reported that he has been a victim of cyber fraud. He stated that on 26.12.2023, he received an invitation on his WhatsApp number 9416243051 to join a group named “Sinha Wealth Institute M 100.” The group had been created earlier on 02.11.2023 from WhatsApp number 6282249237142. The invitation was sent by Nisha Gupta, using mobile number 8105907215, who w
The court emphasized that bail should not be granted in cases of serious cyber fraud due to potential systemic damage and the habitual nature of the offender's crimes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
