IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MUBIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J.
1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.626 dated 01.11.2025 registered under Sections 115, 118(1), 190, 191(2), 324(4) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Sections 109(1), 118(2) and 238(C) of the BNS added later on), at Police Station Suraj Kund, District Faridabad.
2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner along with other co-accused, armed with deadly weapons, attacked Rijwan and Mossin (sons of the complainant) and caused injuries to them with an intention to kill them. Hence, the present FIR.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no concern with the said offence. He argued that in fact, the petitioner and his family members are the victims in the present case as FIR No.628 dated 01.11.2025 was lodged by the petitioner against the complainant party and the present FIR No.626 dated 01.11.2025 was registered as a counter blast. He submitted that there is old enmity between the parties and out of a grudge against the petition
Custodial interrogation is essential for effective investigation when serious offences are alleged and weapons of offence remain unrecovered. Courts must balance individual liberty against societal i....
Custodial interrogation is essential for effective investigation in cases involving serious offenses and the recovery of weapons. Courts must balance individual liberty with societal interests, prior....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.