SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1889

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MUBIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J.

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.626 dated 01.11.2025 registered under Sections 115, 118(1), 190, 191(2), 324(4) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Sections 109(1), 118(2) and 238(C) of the BNS added later on), at Police Station Suraj Kund, District Faridabad.

2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner along with other co-accused, armed with deadly weapons, attacked Rijwan and Mossin (sons of the complainant) and caused injuries to them with an intention to kill them. Hence, the present FIR.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no concern with the said offence. He argued that in fact, the petitioner and his family members are the victims in the present case as FIR No.628 dated 01.11.2025 was lodged by the petitioner against the complainant party and the present FIR No.626 dated 01.11.2025 was registered as a counter blast. He submitted that there is old enmity between the parties and out of a grudge against the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top