IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JASKARAN SINGH @ KARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J.
1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.08 dated 05.02.2025 registered under Sections 109, 308(2), 308(4), 111(4), 125 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(6), 25(7) and 27(7) of the Arms Act, at Police Station Valtoha, District Tarn Taran.
2. Brief facts of the present case are that the petitioner alongwith other co-accused, fired upon the complainant, with an intention to kill him, when he refused to pay the amount of extortion. Hence, the present FIR.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no concern with the said offence. He argued that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and initially, the same was registered against one Prabh Dasuwal and unknown person. He further argued that the alleged incident took place on 03.11.2024 but the FIR in question was registered on 05.02.2025 i.e. after an unexplained delay of 03 months, casting serious doubt on the prosecution story. He further argued that the petitioner was nominated in this case on
Custodial interrogation is essential for effective investigation when serious offences are alleged and weapons of offence remain unrecovered. Courts must balance individual liberty against societal i....
Custodial interrogation is essential for effective investigation in cases involving serious offenses and the recovery of weapons. Courts must balance individual liberty with societal interests, prior....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.