Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Amardeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J.
CRM-316-2026
This application has been filed for placing on record the reply on behalf of the complainant along with Annexure R-1.
Application is allowed, as prayed for and the reply as well as the Annexure R-1 are ordered to be taken on record.
Main Case
1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.239 dated 17.11.2025 registered under Sections 120-B, 406 and 420 of IPC and Sections 10/24 of the Immigration Act, at Police Station Ismailabad, District Kurukshetra.
2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner along with co-accused duped the complainant for a sum of Rs.41 lakhs on the pretext of sending him abroad. Hence, the present FIR.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He argued that the present FIR was registered after an unexplained delay of more than 07 months, casting serious doubt on the prosecution story. He submits that the firm Visa Scout Immigration was shut in the year 2023 and therefore, the same was not in existence at the time of registration o
In cases of economic offences involving complex fraud, anticipatory bail should be exercised sparingly. Custodial interrogation is essential for effective investigation, as it allows for the recovery....
Custodial interrogation is essential for effective investigation in serious financial offences, particularly where the accused is a primary participant. Granting pre-arrest protection in such cases w....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
