SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(P&H) 251

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS BAHL
Rani – Appellant
Versus
Mandeep Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Gaurav, Sanjeev Goyal
For the Respondent: R.C. Gupta

JUDGMENT :

VIKAS BAHL, J.

1. Mother of deceased-Gagan has filed the present appeal for enhancement of compensation. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal vide award dated 04.07.2016 had awarded an amount of Rs. 10,97,000/- along with interest to the appellant as compensation on account of death of said Gagan which took place in a motor vehicular accident on 12.04.2015. The deceased was stated to be 25 years of age as per the Post-Mortem Report.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that in the present case, the Tribunal has assessed the monthly income to be only Rs. 6,000/- per month, whereas at the relevant time, the minimum wages payable to an unskilled person was Rs. 6,940/- and thus, the monthly income should have been taken to be Rs. 6,940/-. It is submitted that in case the said amount is taken into consideration, then, the total compensation payable to the present appellant would be Rs. 12,49,280/- thus, there being an enhancement of Rs. 1,52,280/-. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted a chart in support of his arguments which is reproduced hereinunder:

3. Learned counsel for respondent No.3-Insurance Company, on the other hand, has submitted that in the pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top