SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(P&H) 1625

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURMIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB STATE AND ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

NAMIT KUMAR, J.

1. The appellant/plaintiff has filed the instant Regular Second Appeal challenging the judgments and decrees dated 06.11.1995 and 28.01.1998, passed by the learned Trial Court and the First Appellate Court respectively, whereby the suit and the first appeal filed by the plaintiff have been dismissed.

2. Parties to the lis hereinafter shall be referred to by their original position before the learned Trial Court.

3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the plaintiff was working as Assistant/Inspector under the Punjab Government since 05.12.1973, with the Director, Local Government, Punjab, being his appointing and punishing authority. He was deputed to various Municipal Committees, where his salary was paid from municipal funds under the directions of the Director, Local Government, Punjab, Chandigarh. In the year 1985, the plaintiff applied through proper channel for the post of Additional District Attorney Grade-II and was duly selected, vide order dated 25.05.1985 issued by the Director, Prosecution and Litigation Department, Punjab, Chandigarh. Upon being relieved from his previous department, he joined the post of Additional District Attorney Gr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top