Back
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, S.P.WANGDI
Dhan Subba – Appellant
Versus
State of Sikkim – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of charges, summary of assets, and trial background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. summary of rival contentions regarding asset valuation and income accounting. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 3. standards for proving disproportionate assets and failure of investigation documentation. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 4. legal sufficiency of evidence concerning marital asset ownership and independent income. (Para 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93) |
| 5. final recalculation and acquittal due to failure to prove disproportionate assets. (Para 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105) |
Wangdi, J.
The Appellant was sent up for trial before the Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, East and North Sikkim at Gangtok, for having allegedly committed offences under Sections 13(1)(e) read with S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
