SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Sikk) 111

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK
BISWANATH SOMADDER, CJ., MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, J.
Ms. Yangchen Donkar Bhutia, Wife of Sonam Pintso Bhutia – Appellant
Versus
Mr. Sonam Pintso Bhutia, Son of Late Lhakpa Thenup Bhutia – Respondent 
IA NO. 01/2025 IN MAT. APP. NO. 96/2025 (Filing No.)
Decided on : 23-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Pramit Chhetri, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Ms. Zola Megi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT : 

BISWANATH SOMADDER, CJ.

1. This is an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for the purpose of seeking condonation of delay for filing of an appeal under section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984. The judgment and order of the learned Family Court was passed in respect of Family Court (Crl.) Case No.36 of 2024, in an application under section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Pintso Bhutia), on 05th March, 2025. The period of delay in filing of the present appeal, as stated in the instant application, is 135 (one hundred and thirty five) days.

2. The question that was posed by this Court is whether the period of 135 (one hundred and thirty five) days can be condoned by this Court under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, while taking into account the fact that this matter is in respect of an order passed by the Family Court, exercising its powers under section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 {which corresponds to section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (falling under Chapter IX) being the old law}.

3. For the purpose of this matter, we need to consider and read section 19(2) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, carefully:-

“19. Appeal.— ………………………………

(2) No appeal shall lie from a decree or order passed by the Family Court with the consent of the parties or from an order passed under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974):

Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to any appeal pending before a High Court or any order passed under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (2 of 1974) before the commencement of the Family Courts (Amendment) Act, 1991.”

4. A plain reading of the above provision of law clearly reveals that in the facts of the instant case, there is no scope for any appeal from an order passed by the Family Court under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (which dealt with maintenance under section 125 of the old law) and which is now squarely covered under section 144, falling under Chapter X of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Since there is no scope for maintaining any appeal against an order passed by the Family Court under section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, there is no question of this Court exercising its discretion to condone the delay in preferring an appeal from an order therefrom.

6. The application is, therefore, liable to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top