R.P.MISHRA, A.P.SAHI
SUBHASH CHAND GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
U. P. FINANCIAL CORPORATION, KANPUR – Respondent
( 2 ) THE matter was heard and an interim order was passed on 24-3-1995 calling upon the financial Corporation to file counter affidavit and it was directed that in the meanwhile the auction shall not be finalized without considering the objection of the petitioner. Pursuant to the said interim order, a decision was taken by the respondent financial Corporation on 22-4-1995 in the meeting of a Committee of the Corporation whereby it was resolved that since the Corporation had already entered into a lawful agreement with the respondent No. 3- M/s.
S.J.S. Business Enterprises P.Ltd. v. State of Bihar
Beg Raj Singh v. State of U. P.
Haryana Financial Corporation v. Jagdamba Oil Mills
Dutta Associates Pvt. Ltd. v. Indo Mercantiles Pvt. Ltd.
U.P.Financial Corporation v. Gem Cap (India) Pvt. Ltd.
M.C.Chcko v. State Bank of Travancore
Delhi Motor Co. v. U. A. Basarurkar
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bihar and Orissa v. Patney and Co.
Pannalal Binjraj v. Union of India
REFERRED TO : Huda v. Babeswar Kanhar
Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai
Shiv Sagar Tiwari v. Union of India
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Sterling Computers Ltd. v. M/s. M and N Publications Ltd.
Chairman and Managing Director, SIPCOT, Madras v. Contromix Pvt. Ltd.
Mahesh Chandra v. Regional Manager, U. P. Financial Corporation
Bhut Nath v. State of West Bengal
Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde v. Mallikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.