SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 895

GHANSHYAM DASS, B.S.CHAUHAN
R. C. CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
VICE-CHANCELLOR, . BHIM RAO AMBEDKAR UNIVERSITY, AGRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Bhushan, PANKAJ MITTAL

( 1 ) THIS application has been filed to vacate the ex parte interim order dated 17-2-2003, passed by the Court in favour of the petitioner staying the operation of the impugned order dated 1-2-2003 by which the Principal of the college had passed the impugned order removing the petitioner from the post of the Head of the department.

( 2 ) FACTS and circumstances giving rise to this application are that petitioner had been removed from the post of the Head of the Department by the respondent No. 3 vide order dated 1st February, 2003 and this court vide order dated 17-2-2003 stayed the operation thereof. The applicant-respondent no. 3 filed an application on 12th March, 2003 to vacate the said order dated 17-2-2003. Petitioners counsel did not make any attempt to get the matter listed and at this stage we are considering the application dated 12th March, 2003. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in view of the provisions of clause (3) of Article 226 of the Constitution if an application for vacating the ex parte interim order passed by the Court is not heard within a period of two weeks from the date of its filing, the interim order passed earlier stands vacated aut


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top