SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 92

S.K.DHAON
HARI KRISHNA LAL – Appellant
Versus
ATAL BIHARI BAJPAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANITA A.AGARWAL, B.P.AVASTHI, G.K.MEHROTRA, KRISHNA RAJ SINGH, NIRAJ TRIPATHI, R.N.TRIVEDI

S. K. DHAON, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner whose nomination paper was rejected by the Returning Officer has filed the instant petition under S. 81 read with S. 100 (1) (c) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred as the Act) challenging the election of 13th Lok Sabha from 20 Lucknow parliamentary Constituency which was held in the year 1999 in which the respondent was declared elected.

( 2 ) ON 7/01/2000 notice was issued by this Court to the respondent for filing written statement. On behalf of the respondent an application under S. 86 of the Act read with Order 6, Rule 16, O. 7, R. 11 and S. 151 of the Civil Procedure Code was moved with a prayer that the present election petition be dismissed in limine as the petitioner has no right to file the petition under S. 81 of the Act. It was also stated, inter alia, that the petitioner was not a duly nominated candidate as no affidavit was filed by him, as required, and as such he had no locus standi to maintain the petition.

( 3 ) ON the request of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent the following preliminary question was formulated :"whether the petitioner has no locus stand












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top