R. K. AGRAWAL, S. N. SEN
BASHISHTHA NARAIN PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, BASTI DIVISION, BASTI – Respondent
( 1 ) BASHISHTHA Narain Pandey, has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned auction proceedings dated 30-1-2002 and all consequential proceedings for the bridge known as prabhu Dayal Vidyarthi Van Ganga Bridge, siddharth Nagar. He further seeks a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to grant the right in favour of the petitioner to collect toll on the aforementioned bridge and/or in the alternative commanding the respondent No. 2 i. e. the Executive Engineering Provincial Khand, P. W. D. , Siddarth Nagar, to reauction the said bridge after following the procedure established by law and Rules 1980.
( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts giving rise to the present petition are as follows : an auction notice has been published by the Executive Engineer, Provincial Khand, P. W. D. , Siddharth Nagar, respondent No. 2, in the daily newspaper dainik Jagran dated 24-12-2001 for settlement of the right to collect the toll on the bridge Farenda Naugarth-Barhni, Shravasti Road 63 Kms. known as Prabhu Dayal Vidyarthi Van
Referred : Raunak International Ltd. v. I.V.R. Construction Ltd.
Poddar Steel Corporation v. Ganesh Engineering Works
Ram Gajadhar Nishad v. State of U. P.
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
Upadhyay and Co. v. State of U. P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.