SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 850

G. P. MATHUR, A. K. YOG, S. K. SEN
SHARDA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.Tripathi, R.B.SAHAI

G. P. MATHUR, J.


( 1 ) THIS matter has come before us on a reference made by a Bench as in its opinion there was conflict of opinion in two Division Bench decisions of this Court rendered in Anupam Sari Centre v. Collector , 1999 (1) AWC 237 and M/s. Lal and Kumar v. State of U. P. , AIR 1998 All 156 : (1998 All LJ 987) and also Writ Petition No. 22507 of 1988 (M/s. R. K. Brothers v. Collector, Kanpur ).

( 2 ) THE case set up by the petitioner is that she is carrying on business of selling and supplying lubricating oil, mobil, grease and break oil in retail and whole-sale basis in the name and style of M/s. Sharda Automobiles Ltd. which is a sole proprietorship concern. In order to meet her capital requirements, the petitioner approached Union Bank of India, Pandeypur Varanasi, for financial assistance, which sanctioned to her a cash credit (Hypothecation) Limit facility up to Rs. 25,000 on 23/06/1992 and the limit was enhanced to Rs. 2 lakhs on 16/08/1995. The amount advanced from time to time was repayable with interest @ 14 per cent per annum with quarterly rests or such other rate of rates which may be fixed and notified as per the guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of Indi




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top