G. P. MATHUR, A. K. YOG, S. K. SEN
SHARDA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS matter has come before us on a reference made by a Bench as in its opinion there was conflict of opinion in two Division Bench decisions of this Court rendered in Anupam Sari Centre v. Collector , 1999 (1) AWC 237 and M/s. Lal and Kumar v. State of U. P. , AIR 1998 All 156 : (1998 All LJ 987) and also Writ Petition No. 22507 of 1988 (M/s. R. K. Brothers v. Collector, Kanpur ).
( 2 ) THE case set up by the petitioner is that she is carrying on business of selling and supplying lubricating oil, mobil, grease and break oil in retail and whole-sale basis in the name and style of M/s. Sharda Automobiles Ltd. which is a sole proprietorship concern. In order to meet her capital requirements, the petitioner approached Union Bank of India, Pandeypur Varanasi, for financial assistance, which sanctioned to her a cash credit (Hypothecation) Limit facility up to Rs. 25,000 on 23/06/1992 and the limit was enhanced to Rs. 2 lakhs on 16/08/1995. The amount advanced from time to time was repayable with interest @ 14 per cent per annum with quarterly rests or such other rate of rates which may be fixed and notified as per the guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of Indi
Krishna Rice Mills v. State of U.P.
M/s. Lal and Kumar v. State of U.P.
Referred to : State of Bihar v. Chaursila Dasi
Aswini Kumar Ghosh v. Arvinda Bose
Referred to : Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank
Director of Industries v. Deep Chand Agrawal
Referred to : R.M.D.Chamarbaugwalla v. Union of India
Referred to : Rao Shiv Bhadur Singh v. State of Vindhya Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.