SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(All) 515

N.N.SHARMA
SUSHILA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
MANOHAR LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.AGRAWAL, R.C.SRIVASTAVA, R.K.DWIVEDI

N. N. SHARMA, J.


( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the judgment and decree of Sri R. K. Rastogi, IV Addl. District Judge, Jhansi dated 7-1-1984 who decreed plaintiffs suit while functioning as Judge small Cause Court.

( 2 ) IT was a suit for ejectment and recovery of arrears of rent and damages for use and occupation.

( 3 ) IT was averred that defendant was tenant of the shop in dispute belonging to plaintiff No. 1 on a monthly rent of Rs. 200/ -. Tenancy used to commence from the first date of every month of english calendar and used to expire on the last date of the month.

( 4 ) RENT remained unpaid from 1-5-1980 up to 30-10-1980 despite notice dated 5-11-1980 served on defendant on 12-1 1-1980. It was also a notice to vacate the premises and determine the tenancy. Defendant neither paid the rent nor vacated the premises; Hence the suit.

( 5 ) PENDING the proceedings plaintiff No. 1 sold the disputed shop to her son, plaintiff No. 2.

( 6 ) DEFENDANT contested the suit on the ground that agreement was to pay rent at the rate of Rs. 100/- per month; Rs. 200/- per month were payable in case the walls of the shop were made pucca; plaintiff did not carry out the part of her agre



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top