SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(All) 71

O. H. MOOTHAM, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, A. P. SRIVASTAVA
MUNICIPAL BOARD OF BAREILLY – Appellant
Versus
KUNDAN LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Brij Lal Gupta, D.D.Seth, H.P.GUPTA, J.Swarup, K.N.Seth

MOOTHAM, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure made by the Judge of the court of Small Causes, Bareilly.

( 2 ) SRI Kundan Lal, who resides in the Civil Lines, Bareilly, was assessed to tax in the sum of Rs. 300 by the Municipal Board of Bareilly on two houses owned by him and situated in Ward No. 2, Bareilly. Demand was made for payment of this amount but Sri Kundan Lal refused to pay and a suit was filed against him in the Court of the Judge of Small Causes by the Municipal board for the recovery of the tax.

( 3 ) THE tax had been imposed a number of years earlier by the Municipal Board in exercise of its powers under Section 128 (1) of the U. P. Municipalities Act, 1916, which provides that "128 (1) Subject to any general rules or special orders of the State Government in this behalf, the taxes which a board may impose in the whole or any part of a municipality are (i) a tax on the annual value of buildings or lands or of both (ii) a tax on trades and callings carried on within the municipal limits and deriving special advantages from, or imposing special burdens on, municipal services; (iii) a tax on trades, callings and vocations includi







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top