TARUN AGARWALA, A.K.YOG
SHIV KUMAR AKELA – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR, SOCIETIES, FIRMS AND CHITS, ALLAHABAD – Respondent
Hon’ble A.K. Yog, J.—In the writ-petition before us, we are called upon, to deal with an issue which is both disturbing as well as vital to the ‘Administration of Justice’.
2. Petitioners are ‘regular legal practitioners’ in High Court, Allahabad. One of them, Ms. Sadhna Upadhyaya, is the former Secretary of HCBA (HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION ALLAHABAD), which is a Society registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860 (as amended in the State of U.P.). They are undisputedly members of Allahabad High Court ‘BAR’. These ‘Advocates’-on their behalf and on behalf of other ‘Advocates’, ordinarily practicing in High Court, Allahabad are aggrieved and complain of being deprived of their ‘rights’ and ‘privileges’ by none else but ‘Advocates’—who are not ordinarily practicing in High Court, Allahabad and/or not in legal profession at all, for convenience—collectively referred to as ‘NRA’ (Non Resident Advocates). They have approached this Court aspiring for protection and expect the Court to save them from being exploited by ‘NRA’ and to enable them to enjoy their privileges and rights in law and enable ‘bonafide’ and ‘genuine’ legal practioners of Allahabad High Court (particularl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.