S.P.MEHROTRA, V.M.SAHAI
RAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
VIDUR GRAMIN BANK, BIJNOR – Respondent
By the Court.—The present Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner, inter alia, praying for quashing the order dated 20.12.2004 (Annexure-7 to the Writ Petition) passed by the Chairman/Disciplinary Authority, Vidur Gramin Bank, Bijnor (respondent No. 1) and the order dated 20.10.2005 (Annexure-9 to the Writ Petition) passed by the Board of Directors, Vidur Gramin Bank, Bijnor (respondent No. 2), and further praying for reinstating the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits attached thereto by treating the petitioner to be in continuous service.
2. It appears that the petitioner while working on the post of Scale-I Officer in Vidur Gramin Bank, Branch Kotkadar, Bijnor, received a show-cause notice dated 4.12.2001 wherein certain charges were levelled against him requiring the petitioner to submit his reply. The petitioner submitted his reply on 8.12.2001.
3. Subsequently, on 14.5.2002, another show-cause notice was issued wherein the petitioner was required to submit his reply against the same. The petitioner submitted his reply on 12.7.2002.
4. A charge-sheet dated 14.6.2002 was thereafter issued to the pet
(2004) 7 SCC 431 : AIR 2005 SC 1367 (Para 20)
AIR 2005 SC 3742 : 2005 AIR SCW 4333
AIR 2002 SC 678 : (2002) 2 SCC 290 (Para 28)
AIR 1986 SC 1173 : (1986) 3 SCC 103 (Para 46)
AIR 1990 SC 1984 : (1990) 4 SCC 594 (Para 53)
AIR 2005 SC 3742 : 2005 AIR SCW 4333 (Para 64)
AIR 2005 SC 1367 : (2004) 7 SCC 431 (Para 66)
AIR 2006 SC 1748 : (2006) 4 SCC 713 (Para 70)
AIR 1986 SC 1173 : (1986) 3 SCC 103
AIR 2006 SC 1748 : (2006) 4 SCC 713 (Para 21)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.