YATINDRA SINGH, RAJES KUMAR, KRISHNA MURARI
VIVEKANAND YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Yatindra Singh, J.—A pradhan of a gram panchayat can be removed for his misconduct under sub-section (1)(g) of Section 95 {Section 95(1)(g)} of the UP Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 (the Panchayat Raj Act). He ceases to exercise and perform the financial and administrative powers and functions (in short, exercise the financial and administrative powers), the moment a show cause notice is issued against him satisfying the conditions of the proviso to Section 95(1)(g) of the Panchayat Raj Act. The main question involved in this reference revolves around,
The right of a pradhan before an order ceasing his powers is passed and the meaning of the word ‘otherwise’ in Rule 5 of the UP Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan and Up Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 (the Enquiry Rules).
THE FACTS
2. The petitioners in these four writ petitions (WPs) are pradhans of different gram panchayats. The show cause notices were issued to them and their right to exercise financial and administrative powers was ceased under proviso to Section 95(1)(g) of the Panchyat Raj Act. They have filed the writ petitions (WPs) against the same. The WPs have been referred to the Larger Bench.
3. There
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.