B.S.CHAUHAN
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT II – Respondent
( 1 ) IN all these writ petitions common questions of facts and law are involved. The impugned award of the labour court dated 30. 1. 1992 has been challenged on various grounds by the State. C. M. W. P. Nos. 21684-87 of 1992 and W. P. No. 32500 of 1992 have been filed challenging the order of reinstatement, while C. M. W. P. No. 21688 of 1992 has been filed against the direction given by the same award for regularization of the services of the workmen. C. M. W. P. No. 16710 of 1999 has been filed by the workmen for seeking direction to the District Collector, Meerut, to make the recovery as per the recovery certificates Issued by the Deputy Labour Commissioner, meerut, on various dates in execution of the award dated 30. 1. 1992. The petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.
( 2 ) THE facts and circumstances giving rise to these petitions are that the respondent workmen raised an Industrial dispute and the appropriate Government vide order dated 17th August, 1987, made a reference to the labour court as to whether the termination of services of the said workmen w. e. f. 16th August, 1986 and 5. 1. 1987 was in accordance wi
Ashwani Kumar and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors.
Khagesh Kumar v. Inspector General of Registration, U.P. and Ors.
Union of India v. Vishamber Dutt
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ashwani Kumar
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shyama Pardhi
Patna University v. Dr. Amita Tiwari
Bhagwan Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Delhi Development Horticulture Employees Union v. Delhi Administration
State of Haryana and Ors. v. Piara Singh
Dr. M.A. Haque and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
State of U.P. and Ors. v. U.P. State Law Officers Association and Ors.
Ajit Singh (II) v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Ashok Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P. and Ors.
M.Pantiah and Ors. v. Muddala Veeramallappa and Ors.
Factory Manager, Cimmco Wagon Factory v. Virendra Kumar Sharma and Anr.
J. and K. ublic Service Commission etc. v. Dr. Narinder Mohan and Ors.
Dr. A.K. Jain v. Union of India
State of Uttar Pradesh v. U.P. Madhyamik Parishad Kshramik Sangh
Krishna District Co-operative Marketing Society Ltd. v. N.V. Puranchandra Rao and Ors.
Smt. Ravinder Sharma and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.
State of Rajasthan v. Hitendra Kumar Bhatt
Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board v. S.S. Modh and Ors.
Chancellor v. Shankar Rao and Ors.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress and Ors.
Dr. Arundhati A. Pargaonkar v. State of Maharashtra
Nagpur Improvement Trust v. Yadaorao Jagannath Kumbhare
B.R. Kapoor v. State of Tamil Nadu
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India and Ors.
Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi etc. etc. v. State of U.P. and Ors.
A.P.Aggarwal v. Government (N.C.T.) of Delhi and Ors.
University of Mysore v. C.D. Govinda Rao
Referred to : Jacob M. Puthuparambil and Ors. v. Kerala Water Authority and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.