SUDHIR AGARWAL
DINESH KUMAR PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Should a person be granted a fire-arm licence only if he or his family or property has been subjected to a serious crime but has been fortunate enough to survive? Can it be said that “personal safety and security” does not constitute by itself a good ground for demanding a fire-arm licence unless identity of the person or the persons from whom the applicant apprehends threat to life or property and also specifies the time, place etc. of such incident likely to occur or he or his family must have been a victim of crime endangering the life of himself or his family members or safety of his property which would fortify his claim of personal safety and security and not otherwise ? Can the requirement of “good reasons” for grant of fire-arm licence under Section 13 of Arms Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 1959”) be restricted or narrowed down by an executive order issued by Government, Central or State, as the case may be, and consideration on the part of Licensing Authority be circumscribed accordingly?
2. These are a few questions which are engaging attention of this Court in these cases. These issues are visiting this Court very frequent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.