O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, R.B.MISRA
T. V. Vatheeswaran – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent
Judgment
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.:- A prisoner condemned to death over eight years ago claims that it is not lawful to hang him now. Let us put the worst against him first. He was the principal accused in the case and, so to say, the arch-villain of a Villainous piece. He was the brain behind a cruel conspiracy to impersonate Customs Officers, pretend to question unsuspecting visitors to the city of Madras, abduct them on the pretext of interrogating them, administer sleeping pills to the unsuspecting victims, steal their cash and jewels and finally murder them. The plan was ingeniously fiendish and the appellant was the architect. There is no question that the learned Sessions Judge very rightly sentenced him to death. But that was in January 1975. Since then he has been kept in solitary confinement, quite contrary to our ruling in Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration, (1979) 1 SCR 392: Before that he was a prisoner under remand for two years. So, the prisoner claims that to take away his life after keeping him in jail for ten years, eight of which in illegal solitary confinement, is a gross violation of the fundamental right guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution. Let us examine h
relied on : Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
Bhagwan Bux Singh v. State of U.P
A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab
Bhuvan Mohan Patnaik v. State of A.P
State of Maharashtra v. Prabhakar Pandurang Sangzgiri
State of Maharashtra v. Champalal Punjaji Shah
Hussainara Khatoon (I) v. Home secretary, State of Bihar
Hussainara Khatoon (IV) v. Home secretary, State of Bihar
M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.