D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, P. K. S. BAGHEL, SUNEET KUMAR
URMILA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, C.J.—The present reference to the Full Bench has been occasioned by an order of the Division Bench dated 3 November 2014. Before we set out the issues which have been referred for adjudication by the Full Bench, a brief reference to the background in which the reference arose would be in order.
2. Clause 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities Distribution Order, 2004 (Control Order) provides that with a view to effecting a fair distribution of scheduled commodities, the State Government may issue directions under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (the Act) to set up such number of fair price shops in an area and in the manner as it deems fit. Clause 4 requires that a fair price shop be run through such person and in such manner as the Collector, subject to the directions of the State Government, may decide. A person appointed to run a fair price shop under sub-clause (1) acts as an agent of the State Government. Moreover, under sub-clause (3), a person so appointed is required to sign an agreement, as directed by the State Government, regarding the running of a fair price shop in terms of the draft appended to the Control O
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.