Sudhir Agarwal, J.

1. This is tenant's writ petition who has lost in both the Courts below inasmuch respondents-landlords' Release Application filed under Section 21 (1) (a) of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as "Act, 1972") registered as P.A. Case No. 2 of 2012 was allowed by Prescribed Authority vide judgment dated 18.7.2013, and, thereagainst petitioner's appeal has also been dismissed by Lower Appellate Court vide judgment dated 24.12.2013.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner contended that respondents-landlords have five house, i.e., House No. 310, 311, 312, 313 and 314, therefore enough accommodation was available to them, yet the Courts below have ignored this aspect.

3. The submission is thoroughly misconceived. The record shows that all these numbers were assigned to a single house and there were 5-6 other tenants also. The above finding is evident from following:

^^izkFkhZx.k ds edku la[;k 310 ls 314 rd esa Hkwry ij vU; 5&6 fdjk;snkj vkckn gSaA^^

English Translation by the Court:

"On ground floor of applicants' House No. 310 to 314, 5-6 other tenants are in occupation."

4. Learned counsel for petitioner c